| Save Camphill responds to leak of Hogg report January 28, 2005 Responding to leaked news of Professor Hogg's interim report on the impact of the AWPR on the Camphill special needs communities, Save Camphill welcomes its conclusion that further detailed research is required to assess the full effect the proposed route would have. This finding concurs with the recent preliminary report commissioned by Save Camphill and conducted by the internationally recognised expert on disability and quality of life, Professor Roy Brown. "We have only just received copies of Professor Hogg's report," Dr Stefan Geider, the Camphill Medical Officer points out, "so it is too early for us to make a detailed response. However, we welcome the fact that Professor Hogg agrees that further and more detailed studies are essential. "It is also important to recognise that Professor Hogg's report restricts itself to examining the psychological aspects of the proposed routing. "Even from that narrow perspective, Professor Hogg concludes that there is a high risk of detrimental effects on the special needs children in our care - specifically during the construction phase, which is estimated to last well over a year. Indeed, Professor Hogg's report questions if the school could actually remain open during that period. "The Camphill communities have a legal responsibility to look after the well being of the 200 vulnerable adults and children in the Camphill Newton Dee community and Camphill Rudolf Steiner Schools. Professor Hogg's report confirms there is risk of damage to these communities and for the individual special needs residents and pupils. "Given that a decision to drive a road through Camphill is irreversible, we believe that risk cannot be contemplated in view of the potentially catastrophic damage that this routing could cause for the communities and the special needs individuals for whom Camphill is home. "While Save Camphill is not opposed to the development of an Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, we must continue use all legal means at our disposal to carry forward our 11-year objection to the detailed routing that threatens 65 years of work that inspires the international Camphill Movement. "Camphill also has no desire to delay the road. Indeed, that is one reason why Camphill formally objected to this routing in November 1993 - more than 11 years ago. It is also one reason why we have been urging the authorities to back up their research into the wildlife effects of this route with research into the human impact. "Like Professor Brown, we are bound to question why this research appears to have been almost an afterthought, starting just months before opening of public consultation." Click here for more information from Grampian TV «back |